The federal government is unquestionably interested in sports. There’s congressional and executive action on college athletics, regulatory jockeying over prediction markets, renewed scrutiny of broadcasting structures and antitrust exemptions, and an interest in the funding and accessibility of youth sports.
But research published today by FGS Global’s Sports Practice – the FGS Scouting Report – found fans put far more faith in sports leagues and universities than in Congress (30%) or the administration (34%) to act in fans’ best interests.
FGS surveyed more than 2,000 U.S. sports fans across four areas driving industry change: betting and prediction markets, college, women’s, and youth sports. A few things stood out:
Prediction markets may be reshaping the conversation, but they are in the early innings of adoption. Just 13% say they currently use them, while 21% have still never heard of them.
Fans are more open to federal intervention in college sports than in other industry segments. Over 60% back congressional action on student-athlete compensation for their personal brand, eligibility rules, transfer restrictions, and proportional revenue sharing between men's and women's programs. The appetite for a federal role is real; the question is what shape it takes.
Affordability is the top long-term threat. Fans identified rising costs – from ticket prices to youth sports fees – as long-term threats, suggesting the industry is not immune from forces shaping our broader national dialogue.
The FGS sports practice can be reached at sports@fgsglobal.com.



